In this month's edition, we welcome Ersin Altun, experienced HR executive, to discuss the overall evaluation of performance management from the perspective of an HR professional. Thank you, Ersin, for sharing your valuable insights and contributing to the industry.
ICAGLAR: What fails with performance?
EALTUN: Performance management in organizations can fail due to multiple reasons. Here is the significant list of why companies fail in the process:
- One-Size-Fits-All Approach: There is no such formula to fit all organizations. Every organization has multiple dynamics (age, culture, learning capacity and division, etc.), and for individual performance evaluation, the priority should be linked to these dynamics and prepared accordingly.
- Traditional Systems May Be Perceived as Punitive: In some companies, a point system or competency validation exists, and depending on how much the company has matured, this can be perceived as a penalty. Due to this perception, it is possible for the system to fail.
- Annual/Semi-Annual Reviews Are Insufficient: Individual performance review mostly takes place once a year or every six months. In today's dynamic business environment, this is not sufficient. Continuous feedback and regular reviews can help with individual effectiveness.
- Manager Subjectivity and Biases: Unfortunately, in some organizations, this can create a discrimination element; therefore, complete and accurate assessment data can help with performance evaluation.
- Top-Down Approach: Instead of just evaluating the employee, 360-degree evaluation and receiving multifaceted feedback can reduce managerial biases.
- Outdated Metrics: Since business and divisional requirements are continuously changing, the metrics should also be adjusted in the same manner. These are up-to-date and relevant performance indicators aligned with organizational goals and should be well managed according to business operations and changing conditions.
- Insufficient Training for Managers: Evaluators are not equipped enough to provide fair and effective feedback.
- Misalignment Between Individual and Team Goals: When not properly aligned, performance evaluations can reflect only individual efforts rather than team achievements.
ICAGLAR: What should we consider for a successful performance cycle?
EALTUN: Every organization has its own story, and individual performance management should be specific to the organization, culture, sector, and business. Also, before execution, it is important for leadership, HR, and functional managers to have common alignment on the system. The performance cycle should be simpler, not rigid, and based on the organizational structure and strategy. It is also critical for management to understand the importance of performance management. Best practices for a successful performance cycle include:
- Set Clear Priorities and Deadlines: Clearly define priorities and deadlines and ensure they are communicated. Team members need to understand organizational priorities, set clear goals and objectives, and establish realistic timelines, breaking down progress into measurable milestones.
- Foster Collaboration: Encourage teamwork and collaboration over individual tasks. Mutually established goals, collective reward systems, and cross-functional teams are important.
- Utilize Technology: Leverage technology to track performance and objectives. Real-time data analytics, digital tracking tools, and integrated feedback platforms should be used.
- Provide Support and Training: Offer support and training to help employees meet their objectives. Coaching and mentoring programs, skill development workshops, and performance improvement resources should be provided.
- Embrace Flexibility: Allow for flexibility throughout the cycle. Agile goal adjustments, regular review points, and adaptive strategies based on conditions should be in place.
ICAGLAR: Is there a best model of performance that fits all?
EALTUN: There is no best model that fits all organizations. Some key elements should be considered when organizations choose the model they want to use. Priority should be given to business requirements, sector, employee demographics, cultural alignment, available resources, workforce expectations, etc. The most critical output of all the different models could be a combination of features or customized models to be able to address the business requirements.
Here are some different models that can give you an idea:
- 360 Degree Feedback Model: This model provides multi-faceted evaluations by gathering feedback from peers, managers, and subordinates, promoting communication, enhancing self-awareness, and improving collaboration across different departments.
- Management by Objectives (MBO): Managers and employees work together on specific, measurable goals, which increases employee engagement and aligns targets with organizational objectives.
- Balanced Scorecard: Goes beyond goal setting to include non-financial factors; provides broader metrics to assess customer satisfaction and organizational performance and improve internal processes.
- Results-Only Work Environment (ROWE): Evaluates employees based on results achieved rather than hours worked; supports flexibility and creativity, reduces micromanagement, and improves work-life balance and employee satisfaction.
- Project-Based Performance Management: Focuses on evaluating performance at the end of each project, reviewing timelines, budgets, and deliverables; particularly effective in dynamic work environments.
- High-Growth Model: Needed during periods of rapid expansion in organizations; requires more attention due to increased competition and focuses on performance management as a foundation for strategic company growth.
ICAGLAR: Is classic year-end performance appraisal really a cure for Organizational Success?
EALTUN: A once-a-year review focuses heavily on the last month and fails to account for performance at the beginning of the year. Also, evaluations can be influenced by the manager's bias, making the assessment unfair and not reflective of true performance. This approach limits employee development, allows weak performance to go unchecked for a year, and reduces the timeliness of feedback, potentially contributing to evaluation biases.
Only 5% of managers express satisfaction with classic performance management systems (Source: Gallup)
Only 10% of HR leaders believe their performance management processes effectively support high performance (Source: Gartner)
Approximately 46% of employees feel their company's performance management processes are ineffective. Some companies are even moving away from annual reviews altogether (Source: SHRM)
ICAGLAR: How can HR improve the adoption and ownership of performance management by Leadership?
EALTUN: Performance management is mostly driven by Human Resources. Due to the top-down approach where the HR department may be biased/not structured correctly for most of the management, HR is usually seen as the dictator side. It is hard to break this perception, and there may be a tendency to see performance evaluation as an HR process rather than a production/operations process.
Correcting this situation can be considered the final stage of setting up a performance appraisal system and can take a long time. For effectiveness, there should be planned training communication, clear expectations and goals, leadership involvement, feedback mechanism, regular evaluations, and strong process support with rewards and recognition.
ICAGLAR: How will new technologies facilitate performance evaluation processes?
EALTUN: AI can analyze performance data from various sources such as emails, project timelines, or customer interactions and provide instant feedback on performance trends rather than waiting for evaluation periods. Also, AI can analyze employee behavior and preferences to recommend learning and development programs tailored to individual needs. This can help AI identify trends in some skills that an employee is not actively using and suggest some training to improve the employee's skills/career. Furthermore, AI can predict future trends, such as employee engagement, potential turnover risk, or future training needs, by analyzing past performance trends.
You can subscribe to the HR Trends & Insights newsletter to learn more about performance management.